R. Mansfield  on February 13th, 2007

Anna Nicole Smith never looked happy to me.

I find it a shame that three men are fighting over the paternity of her child–what does that mean, that she had sexual relations with at least THREE men in the last year?

But the real shame to me is not the immorality of her actions, but my hunch that these men aren’t so concerned over the child herself, but the potential half-billion dollars attached to her.

Dale  on February 13th, 2007

Trent,

I’m really liking your blog. Sorry I don’t comment more. Your “cool test” destroyed me by the way

Anyway, doesn’t this whole Anna Nichole thing teach us how our society values our worth by how many (or few) people want to have sex with us, assuming that sexuality is not a monogomous thing?

Money, power, sex … you’d think after a few thousand years and seeing guys like Nebuchadnezzar eat grass that people would learn that stuff doesn’t satisfy.

By the way, I’m joining the blogging world. I’d love for you to check my new blog out. http://www.lookingforredemption.blogspot.com.

trent.hunter  on February 14th, 2007

Dale, You are the man! Welcome to the blogosphere. Write thoughtfully and write Christianly. You will make a great contribution. – But your link doesn’t work!!!!! At least when I tried it!

Ben C.  on February 15th, 2007

R. Mansifld:
To answer your question, I believe it means she had sexual relations in (about) the same 2-week period with all 3 men that would lead them to believe they could be the father. It just gets worse and worse…

I agree with you about the not being happy part. Maybe it’s just the pictures the media used, but you could totally see it.

It’s never a happy thing when someone passes away (we can assume she wasn’t saved) and it’s just a shame that no one was able to witness to her, or that she was able to accept the Lord as her Savior before it came to this tragic end. We can only pray for her daughter now. That poor baby is going to go through a lot.